Reshoring vs. Global Manufacturing: A Clear-Cut Answer

Remember Long Beach in 2021? I certainly do. 97 ships sitting idle in the harbor, creating zero movement. That image has stayed with me as a perfect illustration of why we need to rethink our approach to manufacturing and supply chains. Today, I want to settle the “reshoring vs. staying global” debate in building products once and for all.

The Cost Reality

Let’s be crystal clear: reshoring isn’t cheaper.

In fact, it’s quite the opposite.

You’re not bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. to save on per-unit cost.

The Real Value

What you’re actually betting on is resilience, not efficiency.

The win comes when your competitor’s containers are stuck in Long Beach or Savannah for 90 days and yours aren’t.

The Critical Catch

Here’s what you need to know: Reshoring only works if you can handle 15-20% higher COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) and STILL compete on:

  • Brand recognition
  • Speed
  • Quality
  • Code compliance

Making The Choice

The decision comes down to your key differentiator:

  • If your only differentiator is price, stay global
  • If your differentiator is reliability, reshore

Conclusion

The reshoring debate isn’t about finding the cheapest solution but about building resilience into your supply chain. The question isn’t whether we can afford to reshore, but whether we can afford not to.

Want to dive deeper into supply chain strategy and construction insights? Follow me on LinkedIn and subscribe to my YouTube.